Skip to main content

Legalism: What It Is & What It Isn't Pt.2

There is an opposite problem with legalism in the body of Christ as well. Saying something is legalism when it is not. If something is commanded in the word of God whether only once or more, no matter how minor it may "seem" in comparison to other commandments, it is not legalism for the Christian to desire to obey God's word. And it is not legalism for a Pastor, Elder or other Christian to reprove a person disobeying these "type" of commandments.

As I attempt to put together what I have mentioned so far in parts one and two, let me site some examples. I have a personal standard to not be alone with a woman other than my wife or daughters in a private place. Again that is a standard. There is nothing wrong with Christians having standards, and it's usually wise. But if something happened where it just didn't work out, it would legalism for me to say I sinned or for someone else to say I sinned. It is legalism to say that music itself, television itself, movies itself, clothing itself, is sin. Now a person can sin of there are listening to or watching sin. They can sin if they are wearing clothing that is immodest, because these things are addressed in the word of God (Rom. 1:32; Ps. 101.3; 1Tim. 2:9-10).

There is also the principal of not causing someone to stumble with something that in of itself is not sin (1Cor. 8; 10:23-32; Rom. 14). As I have learned over the years, thises passages are not referring to not doing a non-sinful thing because someone somewhere at sometime may see you and stumble. But it is referring to a particular person that we know has a problem with something because they are a weaker-in-the-faith Christian, and we go ahead and do it anyway. Then, as Paul says in 1Cor. 8, we are sinning. Not because of the act itself, but because we caused or brother/sister to stumble. Our attitude as Christians should be the welfare of our brothers and sisters in Christ before our own enjoyment. Twice Paul said to the Corinthians (Chapters 6 & 10 in 1Cor.) that all things are lawful, but not all things are profitable. Sin is sin! But just because we have the freedom in Christ to do anything that is not sinful in of itself, that doesn't mean that it is always profitable....to us, others, and especially the Lord. May the Lord give us wisdom to understand what legalism is, and what legalism is not! Bret

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why...
12 comments
Read more

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!
12 comments
Read more

So Many Religions...Is That True?

That's the way the world looks at it. Many religions and many paths to God, most people think. But is that true? I mean, look at what we got: Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Roman Catholics, Protestants, Baptists, and more. Which one is right? Now bear with me before jumping the gun about me lumping in Protestants and Baptists with that group. How do we respond and deal with so many religions? Is there really that many? I say no! Because when it really comes down to it, there are only 2 kinds of religions...Works and Grace, Self and Christ. The works/self way leads to condemnation, the Christ/Grace way leads to eternal life in heaven. There may be many founders behind all those religions, but the one thing they all have in common is the false belief that works completely or partly saves them. It doesn't matter what name is behind it (including Christian), if they believe that sacraments, ordinances, charitable deeds, or good works helps get t...
13 comments
Read more