Skip to main content

"Elders are the Spiritual Parents for Believers" By Pastor Keith Sherlin (www.essentialchristianity.com)

Elders are the Spiritual Parents for Believers

Doctrinal Thoughts

As we close in our last study on the doctrine of the church let us focus a few minutes on a subject that is very plain from Scripture. The church, if it is a pure and true church according to the New Testament, must have a body of elders to rule, govern, and guide the church just like a parent guides his or her children. The elders are the spiritual parents for the church. For example, the elder John called the congregation his “children” (3 John 4). Furthermore, it is also plain that other elders appoint the elders. The elders are responsible to shepherd the sheep. And consequently the shepherds, the elders, are not hired and fired by the whims of the sheep. Any church that does not embrace the essential truths to the doctrine of eldership violates Scripture in a major way. The eldership, a plurality of elders, is the authoritative leaders of the body. Additionally the elders are not simply voted into office or voted out of office by their spiritual children, which would be equivalent to children voting out their parents or employees voting out (firing) the employers.



First, Scripture teaches us that each church should have a plurality of elders. “Paul and Barnabas also appointed elders in every church and prayed for them with fasting, turning them over to the care of the Lord, in whom they had come to trust” (Acts 14:23). Notice that the word elder is plural. Every church had more than one elder in authority. Read the following texts and you can see that this was the biblical pattern for the NT church (Acts 11:27-30; 15:1-6; 15:22-23; 16:4; 20:17; 21:18; 1 Tim. 4:4; 1 Tim 5:17; Titus 1:5; James 5:14; 1 Peter 5:1). Second, Scripture teaches the elders were selected and appointed by other elders based upon their spiritual, moral, and doctrinal purity (1 Tim. 3:1-7). No elder in Scripture is ever voted in or out by the sheep, the congregation or spiritual children, because the sheep do not govern the shepherds, the shepherds or spiritual parents. Look at Titus 1:5. Paul said to Titus, “I left you on the Island of Crete so you could complete your work there and appoint elders in each town as I instructed you.” Elders are placed in office by appointment and removed only by the other elders. Scripture says that when an elder sins that the elder is to be “rebuked in front of the whole church so that others will have a proper fear of God” (1 Tim. 5:19). However, no elder or church member is to ever “listen to complaints against an elder unless there are two or three witnesses to accuse him” (5:19). Elders are to be disciplined for sin and if it is serious or a habitual pattern then it disqualifies the person from the office. In such a case the elders remove the person from office through disciplinary action. The children, the congregation, do not have the authority to simply oust the parents, the spiritual parents. Biblical process from the priesthood, the believers, and the eldership body must be involved. The idea that the children can simply vote in or out elders is foreign to the NT. Not one verse anywhere in the entire Bible supports such an idea. Third and lastly, let us look at what the Bible says about what an elder does. The Bible says the elder shepherds the flock like a Father governs his household. The Bible shows this parallel. This is why pastoring, the work of an elder, is compared to being a parent. The elder “must manage his own family well, with children who respect and obey him. For if a man cannot manage his own household, how can he take care of God’s church” (1 Tim. 3:4-5)? This verse teaches us that pastoring is like shepherding in the home (It does not exclude those without children as proved by Jesus and Paul). This is why pastors can be viewed as your spiritual parents. The church is simply an extended family. Take some time to read Hebrews 13:17 and 1 Peter 5:1-5 as it describes further the work of elders. All of these texts point out what Dr. Wayne Grudem has said: “Two significant conclusions may be drawn from a survey of the NT evidence. First, no passage suggests that any church, no matter how small, had only one elder. Second, we do not see a diversity of forms of government in the NT church, but a unified and consistent pattern in which every church had elders governing it and keeping watch over it” (Systematic Theology, 912).



Life Application
Does your church have a plurality of elders? If not then it is going against God’s plan and it is sinful. Work to change this or find a Bible believing church. Does your church vote in or out elders? If so then ask why has this severe departure from NT practice occurred. Do you personally submit yourself to the guidance and authority of your elders as they guide you from Scripture? If not then repent of pride and arrogance and read 2 Timothy 3 about the characteristics of the last days when people rebel against sacred things like parental authority.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why

Christian Discussions and Chem-Trails

What a title, huh? I just didn't want to post these separately :-). This morning as we were sending off our daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren, there was a Chem-Trail right over us in the sky. Have you heard of Chem-Trails? They are chemicals being put in the sky to supposedly help with so called global warming  :-). Sadly, too many people still think this is a conspiracy theory. For those that do, I recommend you just put that in a search engine and see what comes up and just start reading. They come from the exhaust of commercial airliners, but they are not the same as "contrails." Contrails dissipate and follow the plane. Chem-trails stick around. They have certain chemicals in them (Aluminum and Barium are two of them if I recall correctly) and they just add to the list of toxins that our bodies absorb and endanger our health. If more people would pay attention and communicate with our elected officials at all levels perhaps, we could put a stop to this Lord will

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!