Skip to main content

"Leaving One Church For Another, Church Discipline, Disfellowship, God's Will, and Their Application" By Pastor/Elder Bret Lovitz

Due to recent events and discussions, I thought I would take the time to deal with the above titled issues, and hopefully clarify where I stand at least as "an" Elder of Grace Fellowship that I hope are based on biblical principals, and clarify some possible misunderstandings.

When a person or family is searching for a church, whether it is their first as a Christian individual or family, or because they recently moved into another area, they make the decision of which church to become a member of based on the will of God and biblical guidelines for what a church should be. It is not my intent to go into those biblical guidelines but just deal with it from the perspective that sovereign grace Christians know what those guidelines are. Many areas of the country will not have much of a choice of sovereign grace baptistic churches. Some areas may have more than one to chose from within an hour or so drive. But once that choice is made, while subjective, it's based on what the person or family believes is the will of God.

After they have been a member of that church, what would be reasons why they would want to leave that church?

1. Relocating to a different city, state or country for a job, military, health. Although as you may have seen me write on before, there being a sound biblical church in that city should be the first consideration for "if" and "where" you go.

2. Ministry opportunity, not just relegated to pastor/elder, in a different church and/or area.

3. Doctrinal heresy, a false gospel, or serious doctrinal differences being taught at the church that cannot be corrected.

4. Sin in the church by members or leadership that is not being dealt with biblically due to a lack of church accountability and discipline.

So, what if a person or family leaves, and it is not due to any of these reasons? Are the elders of the church that they left not supposed to ever do anything in any of these cases? Are the elders supposed to do something every time, or try to lead the church to impose church discipline on them in every one of these situations? The answer to both of these questions are no. Each catagory and each particular situation is different. I have never said or suggested that all situations are the same or that every time someone leaves one church for another (especially one of like faith) they should be disciplined by the church they are leaving (what little is left that could be done). If someone left the church and didn't have a good biblical reason to go, I would want to talk to them, I would try to get to the root of the problem, I would try to encourage them to stay, I would tell them I don't agree with them because they don't really have a reason to leave, but I would not suggest church discipline by telling the church not to fellowship with them.

Most of the time the church is mentioned and dealt with in the New Testament, it refers to the local church. Church at Rome, Church at Corinth, Churches in Galatia, Church at Ephesus, Church at Colosse, Church at Philippi, Church at Thessalonica, Church at Laodicia, Church at Sardis, Church at Philadelphia, Church at Smyrna, Church at Pergamos, Church at Thyatira. The Church is both local, and catholic (universal, not roman catholic) making up all the churches in the body of Christ. If the sad occasion occurs that a person falls under church discipline and does not repent after going through the biblical steps, does that mean they can just go to another church as if nothing happened and be a member and serve the Lord there? Are churches not to communicate with one another when a Christian goes from one church to another for non biblical reasons, to make sure such people are not under church discipline? If someone leaves a church for a non biblical reason, is it wrong or unreasonable to expect that the pastor or elders would call the other church that they are going to (if they know what church it is)? The answer to these questions are no. It is part of upholding the biblical principals of church holiness and discipline. If someone flees one church for another because of church discipline or unresolved issues, it is doubtful that they will voluntarily share that information. So wisdom says, that there needs to be checks and balances in place for the glory of God and protection of His church. It's not about lording over the flock, trying to be controling, or abusing God's people spiritually, it's about trying to glorify God by being obedient to His word.

What about disfellowship? Where does this fit into church discipline? Well, there are several passages of Holy Scripture that deals with this that I have already shared in a previous BLOG post. Disfellowship is what is done when someone is put out of the church because they wouldn't repent after the first three steps. Disfellowship doesn't mean "no contact at all." It doesn't mean you don't continue to love them and pray for them. But it means that you don't have that same level of fellowship and contact so that the "watching world" (whoever they may be) will not think the church is condoning them of their sin, and in hopes that the Lord may be pleased to use that disfellowship as a "means" to bring them to repentance, and restoration and reconciliation to the Lord and His church. If the person(s) are not under any official church discipline, but left the church because of problems and struggles they had, even if they are not disfellowshipped by the church they left (all that could be done anyway) because of their leaving in of itself, if the person who left was disgruntled and began complaining and gossipping about their previous church and/or elders, it would be biblical, wise and right for the elders to ask the church not to fellowship with them anymore in that situation until the person repented. In our situation, all that was said to some, was that we would only ask them not to fellowship with the couple who left if the began complaining and gossipping. Praise the Lord, that has not been the case, and there has been some fellowship between them and a couple of people from our church.

Again the goal in this siutation and others like these, is that the Lord would be glorified through the biblical handling of situation as it applies, the holiness of His church (both positional and practical), and the concern for the souls of God's people. Each situation is different. There is no cookie-cutter answer to each type or particular situation. And both elders and members need to be in prayer and examine themselves as to the reasons why these things happen.

I hope the Lord will use this for His honor and glory for both this local church of His here, and abroad through those who read this. Thank you, and may God bless His own!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why

Christian Discussions and Chem-Trails

What a title, huh? I just didn't want to post these separately :-). This morning as we were sending off our daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren, there was a Chem-Trail right over us in the sky. Have you heard of Chem-Trails? They are chemicals being put in the sky to supposedly help with so called global warming  :-). Sadly, too many people still think this is a conspiracy theory. For those that do, I recommend you just put that in a search engine and see what comes up and just start reading. They come from the exhaust of commercial airliners, but they are not the same as "contrails." Contrails dissipate and follow the plane. Chem-trails stick around. They have certain chemicals in them (Aluminum and Barium are two of them if I recall correctly) and they just add to the list of toxins that our bodies absorb and endanger our health. If more people would pay attention and communicate with our elected officials at all levels perhaps, we could put a stop to this Lord will

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!