Skip to main content

Biblical Discipline of Children & Social Services

Earlier today, I was brought into a discussion involving someone's concern about potential abuse and whether they should call Social Services or not. In this particular case the concerned person says that one of the Elders of a church is the one potentially involved in the alleged abuse, and the other Elder is supportive of his co-Elder. Also, the church is an independent church that does not associate with other churches. The question put to our Reformed Baptist List that has mostly active or inactive pastors on it, is what should he/she do.

It certainly causes me thought on how to handle such situations should I ever be more directly involved in it in our community here in Mountain Home. I received an e-mail from one of the other members of the List and we discussed it together briefly, with both of us bringing out some biblical pricipals and other concerns:

1. We need to remember the biblical admonition to submit to the government's authority in situations like these. They are responsible for dealing with "evil-doers" according to Rom. 13. In addition, many states (and I need to find out if Idaho is one of them) have laws in place that require citizens to report child abuse when they see it, or they can be liable in some way as well. But...what is child abuse?

2. We also need to remember the biblical principal of not submitting to the government's authority ONLY when they require something that is contrary to the Word of God/Bible. In this type of situation, that means that if the parents are administering "biblical" discipline, which includes spanking, then if the state laws say they can't do that either, then the parents would not be required to submit to the government in that area. Further, someone who sees this discipline occuring should not report the parents in this situation because they're obeying God rather than men (Acts 4 & 5). I have read of several documented cases where the Social/Child Services Agency of a State went barging in and took away the children from the parents because they disciplined them with non abusive spanking, and had to fight to get them back.

3. So that's where the "golden rule" of Matt. 7:12 comes into play. In consideration of these biblical principals the person who sees the action needs to act in a way that they would want to be treated if it was them disciplining their children according to the Word of God.

I'm not saying that there will not be instances where Social /Child Services should be contacted. My wife and I have had to consider that in a couple of instances. But it is the responsibility of the person who sees the alleged action, to make sure that there is solid evidence of abuse (which appropriate spanking is not) before they call them, so that they will not potentially cause the parents' biblical and constitutional rights to be violated by the Social Services Agency. But, if all parties involved are Christians and members of a local church, the word of God in church discipline needs to be applied as with any other sin: Go to the person doing the action; if no repentence, take 1 or 2 more with you; if no repentence, bring it to the Elders to be brought before the church; if no repentence, they get put out of the church and involve the Social/Child Services. However, there may be cases where this just doesn't apply. Regardless, we need to use prayer and Godly wisdom in these situations, and make sure that there is evidence of abuse (based on the bible's standards, not the world's) before calling Social/Child Services. May the Lord use these revealed thoughts and concerns for His honor and glory.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why

Christian Discussions and Chem-Trails

What a title, huh? I just didn't want to post these separately :-). This morning as we were sending off our daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren, there was a Chem-Trail right over us in the sky. Have you heard of Chem-Trails? They are chemicals being put in the sky to supposedly help with so called global warming  :-). Sadly, too many people still think this is a conspiracy theory. For those that do, I recommend you just put that in a search engine and see what comes up and just start reading. They come from the exhaust of commercial airliners, but they are not the same as "contrails." Contrails dissipate and follow the plane. Chem-trails stick around. They have certain chemicals in them (Aluminum and Barium are two of them if I recall correctly) and they just add to the list of toxins that our bodies absorb and endanger our health. If more people would pay attention and communicate with our elected officials at all levels perhaps, we could put a stop to this Lord will

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!