Skip to main content

"A Friendly Challenge To Pastors Pt.2" From Grace Ref.Bapt.Ch. (www.grbc.net/resources/newspaper/a_friendly_challenge_to_pastors_2.php)

A Friendly Challenge to Pastors (Part 2)

Ephesians 5:23 states simply that Christ is head of the church. That statement reflects the truth that Christ is the incarnate God, the redeemer of His people, the risen Lord Who has been exalted to God's right hand and given the name that is above every name. The church was given to Him before the foundation of the world and He came in time and purchased it for Himself. The church exists because of Christ and it exists for His glory supremely. It is the happy lot of the church to be under the gracious and righteous rule of the living, glorified Christ.

However, there is a problem: far too often Christ is not treated as the Head of His church. Far too often other wills have priority over His will in the affairs of the church. This can be seen in many areas, I will name a few:

1. The preaching of the Gospel: The Gospel is the declaration of Christ, His person and His work. It is the explanation that He has satisfied the claims of Divine Justice with reference to humans who have sinned and incurred God's wrath. The Gospel explains that Christ invites repentant sinners to come to Him by faith and thus enter into the safety of His death and resurrection. The object of the Gospel is Christ. The aim of Gospel preaching is to entreat people to come to Him. Too often however, the emphasis is placed upon actions to be performed by the sinner. People are instructed to come to the front of the church and speak with the pastor or others. The impression is given that by so doing they are coming to Christ. But, that is not the case. Coming to Christ is a heart matter. Others may answer questions, but coming to Christ is a matter of calling on Him from the heart. No one is an intermediary with Christ. People must go directly to Him by faith. No one can do that for them or with them. It is an individual and spiritual matter. Placing any activity between the person and Christ is a hindrance not a help.

2. The doctrine: Sound doctrine is only that which is taught in the Scriptures. But it is also all that is taught by the Scriptures. Sadly, it is frequently considered imprudent to teach all that Scripture teaches because some members of the church are not of the same opinion as the Scripture. Reverencing the Headship of Christ surely involves the determination to believe and to teach all that Christ has deemed worthy of inclusion in His Word! Sensitivity is appropriate as to how and when to introduce difficult subjects; however there should be no question but that all the counsel of God will be taught.

3. The order of the church: In the Pastoral Epistles, especially, Christ directed the Apostle Paul concerning the proper order of His church, the house of God. ( See 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus.) In these epistles we are taught such things as who is qualified to serve as pastors and deacons in the church, and what are the major elements of worship. It is a serious rejection of Christ's headship to ignore or violate these instructions. How often this is done in the name of cultural sensitivity! One example, it is specified that the pastor is to be the husband of one wife and that women are not permitted to teach or to exercise authority over men in the church. There are theological reasons for this. It is the will of Christ clearly stated. With increasing regularity His will is being disregarded. Which is an insult to Christ and a grief of the Holy Spirit.

My challenge to God's pastors is this: lead your churches to respect and obey the rule of Christ. The church is not a democracy, it is a theocracy—Christ is King. His Word alone has authority. Therefore, if we would honor Him and know His blessing upon the church, we must magnify His will above our own, or above that of our denominational traditions, or above that of the people. After all, if our congregations refuse to be taught and to obey the will of Christ, are they truly His churches?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why

Christian Discussions and Chem-Trails

What a title, huh? I just didn't want to post these separately :-). This morning as we were sending off our daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren, there was a Chem-Trail right over us in the sky. Have you heard of Chem-Trails? They are chemicals being put in the sky to supposedly help with so called global warming  :-). Sadly, too many people still think this is a conspiracy theory. For those that do, I recommend you just put that in a search engine and see what comes up and just start reading. They come from the exhaust of commercial airliners, but they are not the same as "contrails." Contrails dissipate and follow the plane. Chem-trails stick around. They have certain chemicals in them (Aluminum and Barium are two of them if I recall correctly) and they just add to the list of toxins that our bodies absorb and endanger our health. If more people would pay attention and communicate with our elected officials at all levels perhaps, we could put a stop to this Lord will

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!