Skip to main content

"Appeals Court Hears Bible Distribution Case"

Appeals Court Hears Bible Distribution Case
By Nathan Burchfiel
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
April 13, 2007

(CNSNews.com) - The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday heard arguments in a case that will decide whether a leading Bible distribution group will be allowed to hand out the religious texts at public schools.

The Gideons International, the 108-year-old missionary organization best known for its Bibles-in-hotels distribution program, passed out Bibles to students in Missouri's South Iron R-1 School District under a policy allowing the open distribution of non-educational material.

But the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed suit, prompting District Judge Catherine Perry to issue a preliminary injunction last September halting the Bible distribution.

Liberty Counsel, a Christian litigation group, has appealed the decision, arguing that the injunction is unconstitutional because it singles out one religious text for exclusion.

"The First Amendment clearly provides that community groups must receive equal treatment," Liberty Counsel founder and Chairman Mathew Staver said. "The ACLU may not like the fact that an equal access policy gives equal access for religious speech, even the Bible, but in fact, it requires equal treatment.

"The Bible must be permitted because these other pieces [literature from organizations including the Red Cross and Boy and Girl Scouts] are also permitted, and to ban the Bible is clearly an unconstitutional viewpoint based discrimination," Staver told Cybercast News Service Thursday.

A spokesman for the ACLU's branch in Eastern Missouri, which is handling the case, did not respond to requests for comment.

ACLU Eastern Missouri Executive Director Brenda Jones argues the case is in fact about protecting religious liberty.

"Religious liberty is among the most fundamental of the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights," she said in an earlier statement. "And religious liberty is best protected by keeping the government out of the realm of religions."

The case is not the only clash between the ACLU and the Gideons. In December of 2006, the Arkansas branch of the civil liberties group criticized a school district for permitting distribution of Bibles to students on school property.

"The First Amendment prohibits the government from putting children in the difficult position of deciding whether to accept or reject such religious materials offered to them at school," Arkansas ACLU Executive Director Rachel Sklar said in a letter to the school's superintendent.

"Distributing on school grounds religious materials designed to proselytize or convert violates the Establishment Clause value of official religious neutrality," she said.

In 1993, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the Gideons in a similar case, ruling that "the First Amendment prohibits the government from putting children in this difficult position."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why

Christian Discussions and Chem-Trails

What a title, huh? I just didn't want to post these separately :-). This morning as we were sending off our daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren, there was a Chem-Trail right over us in the sky. Have you heard of Chem-Trails? They are chemicals being put in the sky to supposedly help with so called global warming  :-). Sadly, too many people still think this is a conspiracy theory. For those that do, I recommend you just put that in a search engine and see what comes up and just start reading. They come from the exhaust of commercial airliners, but they are not the same as "contrails." Contrails dissipate and follow the plane. Chem-trails stick around. They have certain chemicals in them (Aluminum and Barium are two of them if I recall correctly) and they just add to the list of toxins that our bodies absorb and endanger our health. If more people would pay attention and communicate with our elected officials at all levels perhaps, we could put a stop to this Lord will

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!