Skip to main content

"What principles should guide Christians as they interact online?" By Nathan Busenitz in Pulpit Magazine

(By Nathan Busenitz)

The question we are seeking to answer is: What principles should guide
Christians as they interact online?

Speak the Truth in Love

In Ephesians 4:15, Paul tells his readers to speak the truth in love. There are
two important applications of this passage as it relates to Christian
communication (both online and off). These are basic points from the verse, but
they are equally important: First, we are to speak the truth. Second, we are to
do so in a way that is characterized by love.

The context of Paul’s instruction centers around doctrinal issues (in v. 14),
and is directly applicable to the edification of fellow believers (in v. 16). We
are to speak the truth, then, in contrast to the falsehood of erroneous
doctrine; and we are to do so in love, for the purpose of building up the body
of Christ.

Speaking the truth addresses the content of what we say. We are to be those who
guard, echo, and uphold the truth. That means there will also be times when we
need to confront error, as we contend earnestly for the faith. As those who
speak the truth, we will necessarily expose falsehood.

Biblical love is courageous and forthright when it needs to be. But it is also
characterized by gentleness, patience, and kindness. It is this type of
steadfast yet gracious love that we should pursue in our blogging efforts.
Speaking the truth in love addresses the way in which we speak. We must not be
obnoxious with the truth, or personally offensive in how we approach others.
Rather, we are called to communicate truth in such a way that the body of Christ
is edified. Our words, especially when aimed at fellow believers, must be
characterized by biblical love.

When we speak of love, we are not suggesting that we should ignore error or
blindly tolerate “every wind of doctrine.” Not at all. Biblical love “does not
rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth” (1 Cor. 13:6). In fact,
the writers of the NT reserved their harshest criticisms for those who would
promote false doctrine (Matt. 23:13–26; Gal. 1:6–9; 2 Peter 2; 1 John 2:18–24;
Jude). Biblical love demands that we protect fellow believers from what we know
to be potential threats and dangerous trends (cf. Acts 20:28; 1 Tim. 6:20; 2
Tim. 1:14; Titus 1:9–11; 2 Peter 3:17; 1 John 5:21).

Yet, at the same time, biblical love is also patient, kind, humble, selfless,
and not-easily provoked (1 Cor. 13:4-5). It is a sincere love (1 Pet. 1:22; Rom.
12:9) that is characterized by the phrase: “If possible, so far as it depends on
you, be at peace with all men” (Rom. 12:18). It exhibits the fruit of the Spirit
(Gal. 5:22–23) and, when exemplified in the lives of godly people is not
quick-tempered, self-willed, pugnacious, or needlessly quarrelsome (Titus 1:7; 2
Tim. 2:24–25). It is not soft on false doctrine or on false teachers; but it is
soft with compassion and seasoned with grace in its dealings with fellow
brothers and sisters in Christ.

We might add here that love is not easily angered (1 Cor. 13:5), recognizing
that, as a general rule, the anger of man does not achieve the righteousness of
God (James 1:20; cf. Eph. 4:26). As Solomon wrote, “He who is slow to anger has
great understanding, but he who is quick-tempered exalts folly” (Prov. 14:29);
and, “An angry man stirs up strife, and a hot tempered man abounds in
transgression” (Prov. 29:22); and again, “Do not be eager in your heart to be
angry, for anger resides in the bosom of fools” (Eccl. 7:9; see also Prov.
14:17; 15:1; 16:32; 19:11, 19; 22:24; 29:11).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why

Christian Discussions and Chem-Trails

What a title, huh? I just didn't want to post these separately :-). This morning as we were sending off our daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren, there was a Chem-Trail right over us in the sky. Have you heard of Chem-Trails? They are chemicals being put in the sky to supposedly help with so called global warming  :-). Sadly, too many people still think this is a conspiracy theory. For those that do, I recommend you just put that in a search engine and see what comes up and just start reading. They come from the exhaust of commercial airliners, but they are not the same as "contrails." Contrails dissipate and follow the plane. Chem-trails stick around. They have certain chemicals in them (Aluminum and Barium are two of them if I recall correctly) and they just add to the list of toxins that our bodies absorb and endanger our health. If more people would pay attention and communicate with our elected officials at all levels perhaps, we could put a stop to this Lord will

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!