Skip to main content

Conservatism: Ghost of Liberalism Past By: Reed R. Heustis, Jr., Esq. Christian Constitutionalist

Christian Constitutionalist
http://www.christianconstitutionalist.com

# * # * # * # * ==============
* # * # * # * # ==============
# * # * # * # * ==============
* # * # * # * # ==============
==============================
==============================
==============================


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conservatism: Ghost of Liberalism Past
By: Reed R. Heustis, Jr., Esq.
Christian Constitutionalist
May 26, AD 2007

University political science classes indoctrinate millions of students every year with the Liberal-versus-Conservative myth that gets perpetuated in establishment American politics at all levels of government. Supposedly, on the "Left" is the ideology of Liberalism, and on the "Right" is Conservatism. All political struggles, the Poli Sci professor instructs, take place upon this continuum.
Although there exist other theories of government, most people subscribe to the above concept. People on the "Right" smear their liberal counterparts as "liberal lunatics" or "leftist radicals," whereas those on the "Left" demonize their conservative opponents as "right-wing bigots" or "fascist extremists."

In a way, both "wings" have a love-hate relationship with one another. Without conservatives to bash, liberals would have to come up with some other form of ideology. The same goes for conservatives, but even more so. Where would Rush Limbaugh be but for the rants of contemporary liberals?

Ironically though, Conservatism is nothing but the Ghost of Liberalism Past. If anything, Liberalism is master, Conservatism servant. Wherever Liberalism travels, Conservatism follows.

Once upon a time in America, perhaps as little as twenty years ago, it was considered "conservative" to oppose any form of federal involvement in education. If a so-called conservative proposed any form of federal program regarding education, then he was in fact pursuing a liberal policy, and everybody knew it.

Today however, a self-proclaimed conservative may publicly proclaim with a straight face the "virtues" of a federal education program, such as George W. Bush's "No Child Left Behind" scheme, and everybody thinks that he is advocating some form of profound Conservatism.

The same is true for so many other issues. In fact, there once was a time in America where homosexual sodomy was a crime, and people were ashamed to be "outed" as practicing homosexuals. Today however, the "Left" celebrates homosexuality and the "Right" now respects it. Even so-called conservative President Bush "appointed numerous homosexuals to prominent jobs in the administration." Tomorrow's conservatives can be expected to promote it, and God only knows what liberals will do.

If today's Conservatism no longer resembles the Conservatism of yesteryear, then what happened?

The Ghost of Liberalism Past - that's what happened.

Recently I had a conversation with a haughty conservative who came across as one who knew everything about politics. His favorite radio show was Rush Limbaugh, and it was obvious that he never contemplated a view of politics outside the establishment's Left-Right paradigm. Everything was Liberal versus Conservative, to him. If America had "true conservative leadership," he believed, then all of her problems would be fixed.

But what is "true conservative leadership" exactly?

During our conversation, I mused that Conservatism is no different than mushy Liberalism because it is not rooted in any solid foundation other than the whims of Man.

With a confused look and furrowed brow, my conservative friend retorted, "Of course it is!"

"Well then, what is your solid foundation?" I asked.

"Traditional values," he replied, eyes rolling, as if I was nothing but a left-wing liberal lunatic.

"What kind of traditional values?" I pressed.

A pause.

"Moral values," he answered.

"Everybody has morals," I replied. "Even an atheist communist has morals. Which morals are you advocating? Whose morals?"

Suddenly the light bulb went on. He noticed that if we continued down this line of reasoning, then we would soon arrive at explicitly Christian politics, something that he definitely was not ready to embrace.

Unbeknownst to him, essentially he had already made his Conservatism - or shall I say, the Ghost of Liberalism Past? - to be his god.

Traditions change. Morals change. People change.

Some change quickly, others more slowly, but the bottom line is that traditions, morals and people all change, and everybody knows it.

Therefore, since Conservatism is rooted in traditions and morals, then by definition Conservatism likewise changes. There is no solid foundation! What one generation considers to be Liberalism, another considers to be Conservatism.

The only meaningful difference between the two is that Liberalism chooses its own direction, while Conservatism follows in its wake. Again, Conservatism is the Ghost of Liberalism Past.

How many times can Liberals be heard stating their desire to get into politics in order "to change the world?" In contrast, how many times have Conservatives been heard stating their political ambitions "to save the world from Liberalism?"

Liberals are born leaders, motivated by what they see as positive change. Conservatives are followers, motivated by fear of Liberalism and a desire to return to what they see as "the good ol' days," which is really yesterday's Liberalism.

So, it becomes obvious. Without Liberals, there would be no need for conservatives. Therefore, the philosophy of Conservatism is rooted in the
wandering star of Liberalism. Wherever Liberalism, the Good Ship Lollypop, sails, the S.S. Conservative pathetically follows.

Christians should stop referring to themselves as mere conservatives. As a Bible-believer, a Christian's politics must be rooted in the immovable Rock of King Jesus Christ. Christians should not just hang their hats on an "America First" political ideology, and call it a day. Nations are here today, gone tomorrow. Only the King of kings, Jesus Christ, endures. The united States of America might be sovereign to a particular point, but they must still bow before the Sovereign of sovereigns. Therefore, a Christian's creed should be, as many American founders trumpeted, "No king but Jesus!"

If the Bible, which is God's Word, addresses any particular political issue, then who are we to argue? Liberals and Conservatives who advocate laws that contradict Godly precepts in any way, no matter how noble their motives might be, ultimately pursue a path of smug, self-righteous arrogance. The truth of the matter, whether they be liberal or conservative, is that they make themselves to be liars. As God's Word states, "...let God be true, but every man a liar...." (Rom. 3:4)

Political science professors should be educated in this truth. Perhaps Christian students in every university across America should stand up and do the educating. Liberalism and Conservatism are flying in the same godless direction.

The political battle is not fought on a make-believe Left-Right continuum. Instead, it is fought along the lines of a Christian versus Humanist worldview, the latter of which manifests in all sorts of grotesque ways. A Christian who finds himself in a political discussion should be quick to steer the discussion from standard Left-Right banter to Belief-versus-Unbelief.

In so doing, he can be confident that his foundation is sure, immovable and solid, which is something that cannot ever be said of one who puts his precious faith in the Ghost of Liberalism Past.

© AD 2007 Christian Constitutionalist, accessible on the web at www.ChristianConstitutionalist.com . All Rights Reserved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Issues I Have Been Associated With Recently

The King James Only Controversy : I have been in 3 churches since the Lord was pleased to save me, the last 2 of them as a pastor. The first church was when I was not a pastor, but did teach Sunday School, and preached occasionally. It was a church that used the KJV of the bible, but neither I or the pastor was hardcore KJV Only. The second church was the first church I pastored. For the sake of some long time members in that small church, I used the King James version for sermons, but after I was there a year or two, I began using the NKJV for Scripture Readings. My third church, which is the one I'm pastoring now in Idaho, does not use the KJV. We offically use the NASB for our sermons, and the ESV many times when quoting other scriptures. I know some of my long time Christian friends from Maryland are KJV Only. I am not. I think it is an issue that we can agree to disagree on, but it seems there may be some that cannot. In the not so distant future, I'll post on the Blog why

Christian Discussions and Chem-Trails

What a title, huh? I just didn't want to post these separately :-). This morning as we were sending off our daughter, son-in-law, and grandchildren, there was a Chem-Trail right over us in the sky. Have you heard of Chem-Trails? They are chemicals being put in the sky to supposedly help with so called global warming  :-). Sadly, too many people still think this is a conspiracy theory. For those that do, I recommend you just put that in a search engine and see what comes up and just start reading. They come from the exhaust of commercial airliners, but they are not the same as "contrails." Contrails dissipate and follow the plane. Chem-trails stick around. They have certain chemicals in them (Aluminum and Barium are two of them if I recall correctly) and they just add to the list of toxins that our bodies absorb and endanger our health. If more people would pay attention and communicate with our elected officials at all levels perhaps, we could put a stop to this Lord will

Are Arminian Baptists Legitimate Biblical Churches?

With all the discussion going on about whether Presbyterians are biblical churches because of infant baptism, I would like to ask if we believe that Arminian Baptist churches are legitimate churches? If a Baptist Church, regardless of their affiliation if any, believes in a universal, insufficient atonement by Christ, issuch Baptist Church really a biblical church? And if so, how can we say that it is when it involves the very heart of the gospel in the atonement. Further, how can we say that those Presbyterian churches that believe in a particular, sufficient atonement yet infant baptism are not biblical, yet those that believe in a universal, insufficient atonement yet believers baptism by immersion are biblical churches. Inquiring mind wants to know ;- ). Thanks..... P.S. Still Baptist and thank the Lord for it!